Fastpace governs the AI coding tools your developers run: one policy across every agent, a signed receipt for each call, and a chain that ties it to the commit. Most products near it do a different job, and the pages below say which ones. Each opens with what the other product does better, because that is the part you need in order to decide.
Prices and capabilities come from each vendor’s own pages, re-checked every quarter. The oldest check on these pages is October 2026.
What a product pays attention to, and what it does about it. Most of the confusion in this market comes from products that answer one question well being sold as though they answered both.
Real controls, and they stop at the tool. Turn them on, then ask what happens when half the team opens something else.
One policy for every agent, a signed receipt per call, and a chain that reaches the commit. This is the quadrant Fastpace is built for.
A gateway or a tracing tool sees the calls your product makes. Useful, and it never sees the laptop where the code was written.
Inventory and policy across every AI system, which is a real obligation. The enforcement and the evidence still have to come from somewhere.
They do, and they are worth turning on. Each one governs its own tool, which is the whole gap: the rule stops at the vendor boundary.
These sit in the same conversation and answer a genuinely different question from ours. These are the real comparisons.
A gateway and an LLM tracing tool govern the calls your product makes. Fastpace governs the agents your developers use to build it. The words overlap and the traffic does not.
Looking at the delivery side instead? The GroundTruth comparisons cover Jellyfish, LinearB, Swarmia, DX and the sync tools.